Survey – Recent Parole Board Practices Parole Board Recent Practices APL EC would be interested to know your experiences, good and bad, so we can raise them at the next Parole Board users group or before if we consider that appropriate. We have suggested that you do not name individuals in this survey in terms of Panel members or caseworkers as we are interested at this stage in spotting systemic trends (good and bad) that can be rolled out or curtailed as required! 01. How would you describe your experience of dealing with Parole Board case workers in the last quarter (June to August)?Worse than usualBetter than usualNo Difference 01a. Comments (including any specific examples of good or bad practice by parole board caseworkers – do not name individuals in this survey response): 02. How would you describe your experience of dealing with Parole Board members in the last quarter (June to August)?Worse than usualBetter than usualNo difference 02a. Comment (including any specific examples of good or bad practice by parole board members – do not name individuals in this survey response): 03. Have you conducted CVP hearings?YesNo 04. How would you describe your experience of CVP hearings GoodBadVaried 04a. Comment (set out here any concerns or good experiences) 05. How would you describe your experience of phone hearingsGoodBadVaried 05a. Comment (set out here any concerns / good experiences) 06. How have you found the process of stake holder response forms EffectiveIneffectiveVaried 06a. Comments 07. Do you know how to escalate concerns in respect of PPCS or parole board workers?YesNo 07a. Comment (Please include in your comments whether it would be helpful for workers and line managers to be published on the parole board website or for email signatures to contain this information) 08. Have you received decisions issued by the Parole Board where you do not know the identity of the Panel member(s)?YesNo If yes, is this a recent development?YesNo 08a. Comment Please use this box for any additional comments.SubmitReset